bin gespannt, ob nun noch was passiert. Angeblich - lt. Chalerm - ist ja auch der Scharfschütze, der Seh Daeng ins Jenseits befördert hat - bekannt. Bisher noch keineplaaloma hat geschrieben:Police reveal suspected arsonists
Upps! Hat das was mit den 10 Mio zu tun?*
Es ist schon sehr seltsam dass Thaksins Braune Ganoventruppe ploetzlich mehrerePol Lt Gen Kamronwit said the team of investigators, only set up on April 10, had made "much progress" by picking out photos of two men from a variety of video and still pictures of people taken on the day that CentralWorld was torched.
Vielleicht bastelt man auch dort noch an einer Story die man uns spaeterbukeo hat geschrieben:
bin gespannt, ob nun noch was passiert. Angeblich - lt. Chalerm - ist ja auch der Scharfschütze, der Seh Daeng ins Jenseits befördert hat - bekannt. Bisher noch keine
Verhaftung und Anklage. Weiters sollen auch die Personen bekannt sein, die Oberst Romklao erschossen haben - auch hier, nix passiert, keine Festnahme, keine Anklage.
Solangsam wird mir klar, warum hier viele ehrenwerte Menschen "veraergert" sind.bukeo hat geschrieben:vergiss mal die gelben Socken, es gibt auch zahlreiche rote Socken. Die roten Socken sind wesentlich mehr mit der PT verbunden, als die gelben mit der DP.Dragon hat geschrieben:
Das ist Rassismus in Reinkultur, aber nicht verwunderlich bei gelben Socken, Faschisten halt!
Man erinnnere sich, das ja 2010 zuletzt die Gelbhemden auch Abhisit stürzen wollten.
Geh also besser von 4 Parteien aus.
1. Rothemden
2. Phuea Thai
3. Gelbhemden
4. Demokratische Partei
Dann tust du dir leichter. Gelb ist nicht gleich DP. Abhisit hat nicht eine Forderung der Gelbhemden erfüllt, daher auch viele Differenzen bei den beiden Gruppen.
Aber abgesehen von Maerchenonkel Chalerms falschen AnschuldigungenGive me my 10 million baht _ I know exactly who the arsonist that torched CentralWorld back on May 19, 2010 is. This dude is notorious. He has struck before and no doubt he will strike again. Hi name is Ai Puad.
He was first identified by Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubamrung as the man who in October 2001 executed an undercover police officer at a nightclub. The crime was wrongly blamed on his son Mr Duang, now a police captain, who back then went on the run and became a fugitive, then surrendered to the authorities and later was acquitted of all charges.
While most of Thai society falsely pointed the finger at Mr Duang, Mr Chalerm knew exactly who the culprit was. He announced it to the entire nation and vowed to lead a manhunt, never stopping until he caught Ai Puad. But alas, Ai Puad has proven elusive.
Nine years later, he torched CentralWorld. It would not surprise me if he was the lone man in black who shot at security personnel, protesters and bystanders too. He may have also stolen my mobile phone back in 2007.
btw es waren nicht nur Nattawut und Arisaman sondern auch JatupornWhat's more, there are video recordings of who might have ordered the arson attack. I'm not saying that there's a direct link. I'm not saying the videos prove anything. I know it's merely circumstantial. But Nattawut Saikuar and Arisman Pongruangrong were both caught on tape urging the burning of Bangkok. It's worth an investigation.
Furthermore, and again, this might not be a direct link, it might not prove anything and it might be merely circumstantial. But word on the street is that both Mr Nattawut and Mr Arisman work for Thaksin Shinawatra. Again, it's worth an investigation. Now where's my 10 million baht? A brother could use a new car.
Sarcasm aside, this is about as much as we know _ the names of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) leaders who urged it all on and who they work for. But this is hardly proof beyond a reasonable doubt, far from it.
So ist es.We also know that after the arson attack, the Democrat Party was in control of the government for 13 months, and the Pheu Thai Party has now been in control for about 21 months. Yet we are no closer to finding out the truth, those released photographs notwithstanding.
But it would be unfair to put the entire blame on either or both governments. After all, it's not the prime minister, ministers and MPs who were responsible for conducting an investigation. The responsibility lies with the Royal Thai Police in general and the Department of Special Investigation in particular.
But is this naive? It assumes that the police force is an agency that operates independently and without political interference, manipulation or direct demands. On top of which, politics itself is also subjected to interference, manipulation and direct demands, whether from some invisible hand here in Thailand or some visible hand in Dubai.
Da stimme ich mit Voranai wieder ueberein, aber gebe zu bedenkenThe reason I harp on tribal patronage like a broken record week after week is that if we don't change our cultural thinking, our social norms, then we have what we have today _ the tangled web we weave when first we practise to be corrupt.
We don't seek the truth. We seek to blame.
Hence in "big incidents" involving "big people", as in 2001 and in 2010 _ as well as all those that came in between and all that came before and will follow _ the tangled web will swallow up the truth, while Ai Puad cries, "Why me? Why is it always me?"
Aktive Forensiker stehen keine zur Verfuegung?? Das hoert sich doch wieder nur so an, es war eine Kugel im Kaliber .223 , aber sie wurde nicht aus den untersuchten Armeewaffen verschossen. Fabio P. hat sich in Richtung Ratchaprasong intersection. Also muesste es ein Rueckentreffer gewesen seinThe Southern Bangkok Criminal Court on Wednesday ruled that Italian journalist Fabio Polenghi was killed by a bullet fired by the security forces during the May 19, 2010 dispersal of the red-shirt protestors.
....The court said he was hit and killed by a .223 calibre high velocity bullet while he was running away from Ratchadamri road towards Ratchaprasong intersection. The fatal bullet was identified by retired police forensic scientist Amporn Jaruchinda.
Jeder Journalist muss wissen welches Risiko er fuer seinen Job eingeht.The court said he was hit and killed by a .223 calibre high velocity bullet while he was running away from Ratchadamri road towards Ratchaprasong intersection. The fatal bullet was identified by retired police forensic scientist Amporn Jaruchinda.
Was steht da? Gibt es da Reaktionen der Armee? ... von DSI? ....?bukeo hat geschrieben:Seht euch mal diese Facebook Seite an.
Scheinbar prahlt hier ein Sergeant damit, Rothemden abgeschossen zu haben.
Gen Prayuth said the case had not even entered an official judicial process yet.
“Soldiers have evidence as well, and the battle should be in court, don’t talk about it outside the court. We must respect the court and the judicial process,” Gen Prayuth said.
Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 43 Gäste
