Anklage gegen Yingluck

Politik und Wirtschaft in Thailand
Antworten
Benutzeravatar
berndgrimm
VIP-5
VIP-5
Beiträge: 10141
Registriert: So 31. Okt 2010, 09:39
Kontaktdaten:

#81 Re: Anklage gegen Yingluck

Beitrag von berndgrimm »

Kevin hat geschrieben:Ich tippe eher auf sein Jüngelchen.
Der ist ungefähr so populär wie das andere Jüngelchen.
Allerdings wäre er auch die perfekte Marionette.


..We finished democrazy for now!.......weiteres unter http://www.schoenes-thailand.at/
Benutzeravatar
berndgrimm
VIP-5
VIP-5
Beiträge: 10141
Registriert: So 31. Okt 2010, 09:39
Kontaktdaten:

#82 Re: Anklage gegen Yingluck

Beitrag von berndgrimm »

Also zumindest der Ohren ohne Arsch Minister war wirklich überrascht
dass er zur Verantwortung gezogen wurde und noch nicht mal gegen
Kaution freigelassen wurde.
Aus solchem Stoff sind eigentlich Kronzeugen gemacht……
Denn auch wenn mal offensichtlich aus Versehen wirklich Schuldige
verurteilt wurden.
Der „Mastermind“ kam wieder mal straflos davon.

Dies sieht man offensichtlich auch in der Junta so:
MEECHAI RUCHUPAN, chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC), has suggested that ex-commerce minister Boonsong Teriyapirom, who has been jailed for 42 years for his role in fake rice export deals, should disclose all the crucial details of the case during an upcoming review of the Supreme Court’s sentence.

According to the High Court, Boonsong and 19 others violated multiple sections of the Criminal Code, anti-graft and state auction laws by implementing four bogus government-to-government (G-to-G) rice export deals to private companies that sold them to a foreign country, resulting in Bt16.9-billion financial damage to the state.

According to the court, the sales did not meet the criteria for G-to-G deals and the rice was not shipped to China as claimed by the defendants.

The fake contracts occurred during the previous Yingluck Shinawatra government’s rice-pledging scheme.

More than four million tonnes of government-owned rice, purchased from farmers under the pledging scheme, were sold without auction to Thai private firms at a low price instead of being exported to China as announced by the Commerce Ministry.

Meechai’s suggestion followed a Facebook post by Suranand Vejjajiva, a friend of Boonsong, in which Suranand expressed his sympathy for the ex-minister and wrote that Boonsong had previously refused to disclose crucial details of the bogus G-to-G deals during a private conversation.

According to Suranand, Boonsong insisted that he could not say anything at all with regard to the contracts.

Under the current Constitution, both defendants and plaintiffs could seek an appeal on verdicts delivered by the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Political Office Holders within 30 days regardless of whether there is new evidence or not.


In the fake G-to-G rice case, Boonsong, former deputy commerce minister Phumi Saraphol, senior Commerce Ministry officials and private rice trading firm executives, were sentenced to between 24 and 48 years in prison for violating multiple laws and causing the massive financial damage.

Regarding the possibility of Boonsong’s temporary release while seeking a review of his case, Meechai said such a decision is made by a panel of judges responsible for the case. The judges already rejected Boonsong’s first bail request last Friday due to his lengthy jail term.

Boonsong was ill during the weekend inside Bangkok’s Klongprem central prison, according to his lawyer, Narin Somneuk.

Meanwhile, a lawyer presenting Manas Soiploy, former director-general of the Department of Foreign Trade, who was also sentenced to a long jail term in the fake rice deal, said the High Court will be requested to consider temporary release of Manas and other former senior officials as they seek a review of the verdicts.
Inzwischen hat sich der Verhaftete mit Ohrenschmerzen ins Krankenhaus begeben!
..We finished democrazy for now!.......weiteres unter http://www.schoenes-thailand.at/
Antworten

Wer ist online?

Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 7 Gäste