Da hat man Thaksin so kurz vor der Trillion gestoppt! Schade aber auch.Yingluck responsible for Bt250 billion in damages in rice pledging scheme: panel
THE NATION February 12, 2016 1:00 am
A FACT-FINDING panel probing civil liability of the previous government’s rice-pledging programme has held former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra responsible for an estimated Bt250 billion in damage caused to the state coffers, according to sources at the Finance Ministry.
The ministry's Comptroller-General's Department played a key role in probing the civil-liability case against Yingluck. A fact-finding panel was set up by Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and chaired by Jirachai Moontongroy, deputy permanent secretary to the PM's Office.
The Jirachai panel's report indicates that Yingluck was negligent and should be held accountable for significant financial damage even though farmers benefited from the rice-pledging scheme during her tenure.
Jirachai pointed to three major mistakes in the rice-pledging scheme. First, the policy allowed farmers to pledge their rice with no limits on the quantity at a price much higher than being offered by the market. Second, there were fake government-to-government rice deals. Third, the Yingluck government failed to call a halt to the scheme despite repeated warnings from the anti-graft agency.
The report said the previous government spent a total of Bt990 billion on the farmer-subsidy programme until May 2014.
Obiges hört sich ja schön an, ist aber Alles nur Schaumschlägerei.
Von Yingluck bekommt man keinen Satang!
Allein die Tatsache dass man sie die selbst Vermögenswerte von über 650 Millionen THB
in Thailand angegeben hat für lächerliche 30 Millionen THB Kaution laufen liess
zeigt wie daneben man hier ist.
Ausserdem las ich gestern irgendwo sie wäre "unschuldig" weil ja der Grossteil der
Reissubventionen bei den Reisbauern angekommen wäre....
Dass wäre ungefähr so als wäre ein Bankräuber unschuldig weil er nicht alles Geld
was in der Bank war geraubt hat sondern nur 30%!
Im Übrigen:Die Leute die an dem Betrug direkt verdient haben und von denen
mit Artikel 44 sicher noch etwas wiederzuholen wäre, lässt man unbehelligt.